Background: (18)FDG-PET plays a significant role in diagnosing malignancy of lung lesions but remains an expensive test available at a limited number of sites in Italy. Objective: We prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT and (18)FDG-PET in patients with indeterminate lung lesions to demonstrate that (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT may be considered as a valid alternative when (18)FDG-PET is not available. Methods: 52 patients with indeterminate lung lesion were examined by (18)FDG-PET and (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT before surgery. The scintigraphic findings were analyzed visually and semiquantitatively and then correlated to the definitive diagnosis. Results: 38 were malignant lesions while 14 were benign. At visual analysis, the sensitivities of (18)FDG-PET and (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT were 92 and 84%, respectively (McNemar test p = 0.4), whereas the specificities were 78.6 and of 93% (p = 1.0), respectively. At semiquantitative analysis, (18)FDG-PET showed a sensitivity and specificity of 92 and 71.4%, respectively, while (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT produced a sensitivity and specificity of 86 and 100%, respectively (p = 0.194). For lymph node staging, (18)FDG-PET and (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT have a sensitivity and specificity of 88 and 92 of 77 and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT is similar to (18)FDG-PET in the detection of lung malignancies and represents an alternative when PET is not available. Yet, the combination of both techniques may improve patient selection for surgery. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

F-18-2-Fluoro-2-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Compared to Technetium-99m Hexakis-2-Methoxyisobutyl Isonitrile Single Photon Emission Chest Tomography in the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Lung Lesions

SANTINI, Mario;FIORELLI, Alfonso;VICIDOMINI, Giovanni;RAMBALDI, Pier Francesco;MANSI, Luigi;ROTONDO, Antonio
2010

Abstract

Background: (18)FDG-PET plays a significant role in diagnosing malignancy of lung lesions but remains an expensive test available at a limited number of sites in Italy. Objective: We prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT and (18)FDG-PET in patients with indeterminate lung lesions to demonstrate that (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT may be considered as a valid alternative when (18)FDG-PET is not available. Methods: 52 patients with indeterminate lung lesion were examined by (18)FDG-PET and (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT before surgery. The scintigraphic findings were analyzed visually and semiquantitatively and then correlated to the definitive diagnosis. Results: 38 were malignant lesions while 14 were benign. At visual analysis, the sensitivities of (18)FDG-PET and (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT were 92 and 84%, respectively (McNemar test p = 0.4), whereas the specificities were 78.6 and of 93% (p = 1.0), respectively. At semiquantitative analysis, (18)FDG-PET showed a sensitivity and specificity of 92 and 71.4%, respectively, while (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT produced a sensitivity and specificity of 86 and 100%, respectively (p = 0.194). For lymph node staging, (18)FDG-PET and (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT have a sensitivity and specificity of 88 and 92 of 77 and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: (99m)Tc-MIBI-SPECT is similar to (18)FDG-PET in the detection of lung malignancies and represents an alternative when PET is not available. Yet, the combination of both techniques may improve patient selection for surgery. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/189496
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact