Background The spread of antibiotic resistance makes it necessary to implement Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Programs; the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an AMS program in the management of urinary tract infection (UTI) in emergency setting. Methods A prospective multicentre study was conducted enrolling all adult patients admitted to one of the 8 emergency departments participating in the study with a diagnosis of UTI from February 2023 to July 2024. Only one of the eight centers received a persuasive AMS program. The primary outcome evaluated was the prevalence of empirical antimicrobial prescription belonging to Access class according to WHO classification in AMS and non-AMS ED; secondary outcomes included the prevalence of etiologial diagnosis, the clinical response and seven-day and 30-day mortality rates. Results During the study period, 657 patients were enrolled, 135 in the AMS and 522 in the non-AMS group, with a median age of 71 years (IQR 58-79). Patients in the AMS group had a more severe disease with a higher rate of sepsis or septic shock at admission (p < 0.001). In the AMS group, the percentage of patients with a microbiological diagnosis was higher (67% vs 43.1% p < 0.001); regarding empirical antibiotic therapy, drugs of the Access class were more frequently prescribed as empirical treatment in the AMS group (48.3 vs 37%, p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of 7- and 30-day mortality and 7-day clinical response between the 2 groups, despite the higher severity of patients in the AMS group. Conclusions In the centre where an AMS program was conducted, an increase in the number of positive urine cultures (67% vs 43.1%) has been observed, and a higher rate of prescriptions for Access class antibiotics. Further prospective data are needed to evaluate the impact of AMS intervention on antimicrobial prescribing in emergency setting.
Impact of a persuasive antimicrobial stewardship program on antibiotic use in patients admitted to emergency department for urinary tract infections: a multicentre prospective study
Onorato L.Conceptualization
;Coppola N.Conceptualization
;
2025
Abstract
Background The spread of antibiotic resistance makes it necessary to implement Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Programs; the aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of an AMS program in the management of urinary tract infection (UTI) in emergency setting. Methods A prospective multicentre study was conducted enrolling all adult patients admitted to one of the 8 emergency departments participating in the study with a diagnosis of UTI from February 2023 to July 2024. Only one of the eight centers received a persuasive AMS program. The primary outcome evaluated was the prevalence of empirical antimicrobial prescription belonging to Access class according to WHO classification in AMS and non-AMS ED; secondary outcomes included the prevalence of etiologial diagnosis, the clinical response and seven-day and 30-day mortality rates. Results During the study period, 657 patients were enrolled, 135 in the AMS and 522 in the non-AMS group, with a median age of 71 years (IQR 58-79). Patients in the AMS group had a more severe disease with a higher rate of sepsis or septic shock at admission (p < 0.001). In the AMS group, the percentage of patients with a microbiological diagnosis was higher (67% vs 43.1% p < 0.001); regarding empirical antibiotic therapy, drugs of the Access class were more frequently prescribed as empirical treatment in the AMS group (48.3 vs 37%, p = 0.04). No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of 7- and 30-day mortality and 7-day clinical response between the 2 groups, despite the higher severity of patients in the AMS group. Conclusions In the centre where an AMS program was conducted, an increase in the number of positive urine cultures (67% vs 43.1%) has been observed, and a higher rate of prescriptions for Access class antibiotics. Further prospective data are needed to evaluate the impact of AMS intervention on antimicrobial prescribing in emergency setting.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
