Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
IRIS
BACKGROUNDAKT pathway activation is implicated in endocrine-therapy resistance. Data on the efficacy and safety of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, as an addition to fulvestrant therapy, in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer are limited.METHODSIn a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled eligible pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women and men with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer who had had a relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. The dual primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with AKT pathway-altered (PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN) tumors. Safety was assessed.RESULTSOverall, 708 patients underwent randomization; 289 patients (40.8%) had AKT pathway alterations, and 489 (69.1%) had received a CDK4/6 inhibitor previously for advanced breast cancer. In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.6 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.71; P<0.001). In the AKT pathway-altered population, the median progression-free survival was 7.3 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.1 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or higher in patients receiving capivasertib-fulvestrant were rash (in 12.1% of patients, vs. in 0.3% of those receiving placebo-fulvestrant) and diarrhea (in 9.3% vs. 0.3%). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in 13.0% of the patients receiving capivasertib and in 2.3% of those receiving placebo.CONCLUSIONSCapivasertib-fulvestrant therapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer whose disease had progressed during or after previous aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
Capivasertib in Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Turner N. C.;Oliveira M.;Howell S. J.;Dalenc F.;Cortes J.;Gomez Moreno H. L.;Hu X.;Jhaveri K.;Krivorotko P.;Loibl S.;Morales Murillo S.;Okera M.;Park Y. H.;Sohn J.;Toi M.;Tokunaga E.;Yousef S.;Zhukova L.;De Bruin E. C.;Grinsted L.;Schiavon G.;Foxley A.;Rugo H. S. CAPItello-291 Study Group: Luis Enrique Fein;Diego Lucas Kaen;Ruben Dario Kowalyszyn;Mirta Varela;Guillermo Luis Lerzo;Vanessa Wong;Frances M Boyle;Peter Fox;George Kannourakis;Nicole McCarthy;Nicholas Murray;Meena Okera;Andre van der Westhuizen;Susie Bae;Annabel Goodwin;Michelle Morris;Claire Quaghebeur;Jean-Luc Canon;Luc Dirix;Francois Duhoux;Christel Fontaine;Konstantinos Papadimitriou;Mihaela Mates;Saroj Niraula;Rossanna C Pezo;Martina Puchyr;Joanne Linda Yu;Xinhong Wu;Wenyan Chen;Danmei Pang;Aimin Zang;Jingfen Wang;Ou Jiang;Zhiyong Wu;Florence Dalenc;Laetitia Stefani;Elisabeth Luporsi;Thierry Petit;Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard;Julien Peron;Lucie Monceau-Baroux;Guillaume Meynard;Jean Christophe Thery;Nadia Harbeck;Joke Tio;Andreas Schneeweiss;Pia Wuelfing;Christian Schem;Hans Tesch;Peter A Fasching;Tjoung-Won Park-Simon;Mattea Reinisch;Pauline Wimberger;Michael Braun;Susanna Hegewisch-Becker;Isabell Witzel;Michael Lux;Marion Van Mackelenbergh;Dorothea Wiebke Fischer;Holger Fischer;Frederik Marmé;Martin Griesshammer;Yousuf B Al-Farhat;Peter Arkosy;Tibor Csoszi;Zsuzsanna Papai;Gabor Laszlo Rubovszky;Zsolt Horvath;Tamar Peretz;Karen Drumea;Shlomit Lubovsky;Amit Itay;Iryna Kuchuk;Rinat Yerushalmi;Samih Yousef;Gleb Kornev;Hadar Goldvaser;Margarita Tokar;Luigi Coltelli;Laura Biganzoli;Filippo Montemurro;Michele Orditura;Ugo De Giorgi;Alberto Zambelli;Elena Rota Caremoli;Federico Piacentini;Marco Angelo Colleoni;Giuseppe Tonini;Nicola Battelli;Pierosandro Tagliaferri;Kenichi Inoue;Fumikata Hara;Hiroji Iwata;Hiroyuki Yasojima;Toshiro Mizuno;Takahiro Nakayama;Mitsuya Itoh;Akihiko Osaki;Tetsuhiko Taira;Kenichi Watanabe;Tatsuya Toyama;Yutaka Yamamoto;Toshinari Yamashita;Yasuhiro Yanagita;Kenjiro Aogi;Shigehira Saji;Masato Takahashi;Seigo Nakamura;Masahiro Takada;Masakazu Toi;Rikiya Nakamura;Yeon Hee Park;Byoung-Yong Shim;Jae Hong Seo;Keon Uk Park;Sung Hoon Sim;Moon Hee Lee;Young Jin Choi;Kyung Hae Jung;Jee Hyun Kim;Seok Yun Kang;Renzo Luzgardo Alvarez Barreda;Henry L Gomez;Zbigniew I Nowecki;Tomasz Kubiatowski;Piotr J Wysocki;Bogdan Zurawski;Mona A Frolova;Anna Tarasova;Lyudmila Zhukova;Petr V Krivorotko;Dmitry Kirtbaya;Rashida Vahidovna Orlova;Alexandra Cortegoso;Angel Guerrero Zotano;Eva Ciruelos Gil;Maria Martinez Garcia;Mafalda Oliveira;Manuel Ramos;Manuel Ruiz-Borrego;Serafin Morales Murillo;Agostina Stradella;Silvia Vazquez Fernandez;Maria Gion Cortes;Josefina Cruz-Jurado;Isabel Calvo Plaza;Pedro Sanchez Rovira;Andres Poveda Velasco;Jose Angel Garcia Saenz;Juan Antonio Virizuela Echaburu;Jose Juan Illarramendi Mañas;Yolanda Jerez Gilarranz;Pilar Zamora Aunon;Blanca Cantos;Mireia Mele Olive;Juan de la Haba;Nuria Ribelles;Yen-Shen Lu;Hwei-Chung Wang;Shin-Cheh Chen;Ling-Ming Tseng;Wei-Pang Chung;Chi-Feng Chung;Kun-Ming Rau;Yin-Hsun Feng;Sacha J Howell;Maria Esther Una Cidon;Amna Sheri;Nicholas C Turner;Sophie McGrath;Daniel John Nelmes;Jeremy Braybrooke;Simon Waters;Trevor A McGoldrick;Sibel H Blau;Stephanie Graff;Mohammad Mozayen;Erika P Hamilton;Lowell L Hart;Chrystal Landry;Ruby Sharma;Priyanka Sharma;Eddie Thara;Omkar S Marathe;William J Irvin;Brooke R Daniel;Vinay Gudena;Yu Cao;Foluso O Ademuyiwa;Paul Coluzzi;Katherine H Rak-Tkaczuk;Jeffrey Neidhart;Paula Klein;Lida Mina;Qing Zhao;Hope S Rugo;Joyce O'Shaughnessy;Konstandinos Sideras;Karthik V Giridhar Affiliation 1From the Royal Marsden Hospital;Institute of Cancer Research;London (N. C. T. );the Christie NHS Foundation Trust;Manchester (S. J. H. );and Oncology Research and Development;AstraZeneca;Cambridge (E. C. B.;L. G. G. S.;A. F. ) - all in the United Kingdom;the Department of Medical Oncology;Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (M. Oliveira);the Breast Cancer Unit;Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (M. Oliveira);the Department of Oncology;International Breast Cancer Center;Pangaea Oncology;Quiron Group;Medica Scientia Innovation Research (J. C. );and Institut de Recerca Biomèdica (S. M. M. );Barcelona;and the Department of Medicine;Faculty of Biomedical and Health Sciences;Universidad Europea de Madrid;Madrid (J. C. ) - all in Spain;Institut Claudius Regaud;Institut Universitaire du Cancer-Oncopole Toulouse;Toulouse;France (F. D. );Departamento de Oncología Médica;Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas;and Universidad Ricardo Palma - both in Lima;Peru (H. L. G. M. );Shanghai Cancer Center;Fudan University;Shanghai;China (X. H. );Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College - both in New York (K. J. );Petrov Research Institute of Oncology;St. Petersburg (P. K. );and Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center;Moscow (L. Z. ) - both in Russia;GBG Forschungs;Neu-Isenburg;and the Center for Hematology and Oncology;Bethanien;Frankfurt - both in Germany (S. L. );Icon Cancer Centre;Adelaide SA;Australia (M. Okera);Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine;Samsung Medical Center (Y. H. P. );and Yonsei University College of Medicine;Yonsei Cancer Center (J. S. ) - both in Seoul;Kyoto University Hospital;Kyoto (M. T. );and National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center;Fukuoka (E. T. ) - both in Japan;Emek Medical Center;Afula;Israel (S. Y. );and the University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco (H. S. R. ).
2023
Abstract
BACKGROUNDAKT pathway activation is implicated in endocrine-therapy resistance. Data on the efficacy and safety of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, as an addition to fulvestrant therapy, in patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer are limited.METHODSIn a phase 3, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled eligible pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal women and men with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer who had had a relapse or disease progression during or after treatment with an aromatase inhibitor, with or without previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive capivasertib plus fulvestrant or placebo plus fulvestrant. The dual primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival assessed both in the overall population and among patients with AKT pathway-altered (PIK3CA, AKT1, or PTEN) tumors. Safety was assessed.RESULTSOverall, 708 patients underwent randomization; 289 patients (40.8%) had AKT pathway alterations, and 489 (69.1%) had received a CDK4/6 inhibitor previously for advanced breast cancer. In the overall population, the median progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.6 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.71; P<0.001). In the AKT pathway-altered population, the median progression-free survival was 7.3 months in the capivasertib-fulvestrant group, as compared with 3.1 months in the placebo-fulvestrant group (hazard ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.65; P<0.001). The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or higher in patients receiving capivasertib-fulvestrant were rash (in 12.1% of patients, vs. in 0.3% of those receiving placebo-fulvestrant) and diarrhea (in 9.3% vs. 0.3%). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in 13.0% of the patients receiving capivasertib and in 2.3% of those receiving placebo.CONCLUSIONSCapivasertib-fulvestrant therapy resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than treatment with fulvestrant alone among patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer whose disease had progressed during or after previous aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/560285
Citazioni
ND
322
293
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.