Introduction: Pustular psoriasis (PP) is a rare life-threatening skin disease with negatively impact on quality of life (QoL). Clinically, it may be systemic (generalized pustular psoriasis [GPP]) or localized on palms and soles (palmoplantar pustulosis [PPP]). It is not rare to observe plaque psoriasis associated with GPP. Objectives: We explored the therapies used for PP and their correlation with patient QoL scores, through a cross-sectional study using retrospective data from a monocentric database in the period 2017-2021. Methods: Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and treatment predictors of QoL were identified by multiple regression analysis. Among 108 patients with PP, 57.4% had GPP + PSO whereas 42.6% had PPP. The therapeutic management is based on systemic conventional treatments and biological therapies in both GPP and PPP. Results: GPP + PSO patients with an impaired QoL (DLQI≥10) were associated with biological therapy including certolizumab (odds ratio [OR]=2.38), etanercept (OR=2.25), secukinumab (OR=2.03) or ustekinumab (OR=2.79) whereas, PPP patients were positively associated with secukinumab (OR=2.85) or apremilast (OR 4.28, 95%-CI 0.56-9.62). Conclusions: Currently, systemic conventional therapy remains the therapeutic fulcrum of PP management. A great effect on QoL, especially for GPP+PSO, was assessed regardless the ongoing treatment and only newer biologic options were able to somehow positively impact.
Real-Life Analysis of Therapeutic Management and Its Correlation with the Dermatology Life Quality Index Score in 108 Patients with Pustular Psoriasis: An Italian Monocenter Study
Buononato D.;Caccavale S.;Argenziano G.;Balato A.
2025
Abstract
Introduction: Pustular psoriasis (PP) is a rare life-threatening skin disease with negatively impact on quality of life (QoL). Clinically, it may be systemic (generalized pustular psoriasis [GPP]) or localized on palms and soles (palmoplantar pustulosis [PPP]). It is not rare to observe plaque psoriasis associated with GPP. Objectives: We explored the therapies used for PP and their correlation with patient QoL scores, through a cross-sectional study using retrospective data from a monocentric database in the period 2017-2021. Methods: Patient characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics and treatment predictors of QoL were identified by multiple regression analysis. Among 108 patients with PP, 57.4% had GPP + PSO whereas 42.6% had PPP. The therapeutic management is based on systemic conventional treatments and biological therapies in both GPP and PPP. Results: GPP + PSO patients with an impaired QoL (DLQI≥10) were associated with biological therapy including certolizumab (odds ratio [OR]=2.38), etanercept (OR=2.25), secukinumab (OR=2.03) or ustekinumab (OR=2.79) whereas, PPP patients were positively associated with secukinumab (OR=2.85) or apremilast (OR 4.28, 95%-CI 0.56-9.62). Conclusions: Currently, systemic conventional therapy remains the therapeutic fulcrum of PP management. A great effect on QoL, especially for GPP+PSO, was assessed regardless the ongoing treatment and only newer biologic options were able to somehow positively impact.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.