Reasoning on articles 5, paragraph 1, and 6, paragraphs 1 and 3, of law no. 40 of 2004, the essay wonders what is the most "fair" definition of judgments against the male partner of a couple who, after having given their consent to the use of MAP techniques, before such treatment is completed by means of the implantation in utero of the embryos formed, manifest the firm will not to continue in the couple's bond, dissolving it, and the equally strenuous choice to interrupt the search for the child, revoking the consent originally expressed for the use of new procreative methods.
Quando si dice non più. Ragionando sugli artt. 5, comma 1, e 6, commi 1 e 3, della legge n. 40 del 2004.
Franca Meola
2021
Abstract
Reasoning on articles 5, paragraph 1, and 6, paragraphs 1 and 3, of law no. 40 of 2004, the essay wonders what is the most "fair" definition of judgments against the male partner of a couple who, after having given their consent to the use of MAP techniques, before such treatment is completed by means of the implantation in utero of the embryos formed, manifest the firm will not to continue in the couple's bond, dissolving it, and the equally strenuous choice to interrupt the search for the child, revoking the consent originally expressed for the use of new procreative methods.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
