The term ‘constitutional identity’ has gained increasing popularity in constitutional jurisprudence. However, it remains a contested concept that accommodates diverse approaches to both national and transnational constitutional issues. Drawing on Gary Jacobsohn’s work, the article will outline a theoretical framework to locate the identity of a constitution through a comparative law lens. To put it in perspective, the article argues that pacifism – lying at the heart of Japan’s postwar Constitution– may be considered a constitutional identity of Japan. On top of it, this identity is gradually changing. The article attempts to capture its dynamic by probing recent constitutional discourses on Japan’s self-defense stance.

Farewell to Pacifism the Changing Facet of Japan's Constitutional Identity

Duc Nguyen Tien
2020

Abstract

The term ‘constitutional identity’ has gained increasing popularity in constitutional jurisprudence. However, it remains a contested concept that accommodates diverse approaches to both national and transnational constitutional issues. Drawing on Gary Jacobsohn’s work, the article will outline a theoretical framework to locate the identity of a constitution through a comparative law lens. To put it in perspective, the article argues that pacifism – lying at the heart of Japan’s postwar Constitution– may be considered a constitutional identity of Japan. On top of it, this identity is gradually changing. The article attempts to capture its dynamic by probing recent constitutional discourses on Japan’s self-defense stance.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/553845
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact