The term ‘constitutional identity’ has gained increasing popularity in constitutional jurisprudence. However, it remains a contested concept that accommodates diverse approaches to both national and transnational constitutional issues. Drawing on Gary Jacobsohn’s work, the article will outline a theoretical framework to locate the identity of a constitution through a comparative law lens. To put it in perspective, the article argues that pacifism – lying at the heart of Japan’s postwar Constitution– may be considered a constitutional identity of Japan. On top of it, this identity is gradually changing. The article attempts to capture its dynamic by probing recent constitutional discourses on Japan’s self-defense stance.
Farewell to Pacifism the Changing Facet of Japan's Constitutional Identity
Duc Nguyen Tien
2020
Abstract
The term ‘constitutional identity’ has gained increasing popularity in constitutional jurisprudence. However, it remains a contested concept that accommodates diverse approaches to both national and transnational constitutional issues. Drawing on Gary Jacobsohn’s work, the article will outline a theoretical framework to locate the identity of a constitution through a comparative law lens. To put it in perspective, the article argues that pacifism – lying at the heart of Japan’s postwar Constitution– may be considered a constitutional identity of Japan. On top of it, this identity is gradually changing. The article attempts to capture its dynamic by probing recent constitutional discourses on Japan’s self-defense stance.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.