Untargeted metabolomics UHPLC-HRMS workflows typically employ narrowbore 2.1-mm inner diameter (i.d.) columns. However, the wide concentration range of the metabolome and the need to often analyze small sample amounts poses challenges to these approaches. Reducing the column diameter could be a potential solution. Herein, we evaluated the performance of a microbore 1.0-mm i.d. setup compared to the 2.1-mm i.d. benchmark for untargeted metabolomics. The 1.0-mm i.d. setup was implemented on a micro-UHPLC system, while the 2.1-mm i.d. on a standard UHPLC, both coupled to quadrupole-orbitrap HRMS. On polar standard metabolites, a sensitivity gain with an average 3.8-fold increase over the 2.1-mm i.d., along with lower LOD (LODavg 1.48 ng/mL vs. 6.18 ng/mL) and LOQ (LOQavg 4.94 ng/mL vs. 20.60 ng/mL), was observed. The microbore method detected and quantified all metabolites at LLOQ with respect to 2.1, also demonstrating good repeatability with lower CV% for retention times (0.29% vs. 0.63%) and peak areas (4.65% vs. 7.27%). The analysis of various samples, in both RP and HILIC modes, including different plasma volumes, dried blood spots (DBS), and colorectal cancer (CRC) patient-derived organoids (PDOs), in full scan-data dependent mode (FS-DDA) reported a significant increase in MS1 and MS2 features, as well as MS/MS spectral matches by 38.95%, 39.26%, and 18.23%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that 1.0-mm i.d. columns in UHPLC-HRMS could be a potential strategy to enhance coverage for low-amount samples while maintaining the same analytical throughput and robustness of 2.1-mm i.d. formats, with reduced solvent consumption

Leveraging the potential of 1.0-mm i.d. columns in UHPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolomics

Manuela Giovanna Basilicata;
2024

Abstract

Untargeted metabolomics UHPLC-HRMS workflows typically employ narrowbore 2.1-mm inner diameter (i.d.) columns. However, the wide concentration range of the metabolome and the need to often analyze small sample amounts poses challenges to these approaches. Reducing the column diameter could be a potential solution. Herein, we evaluated the performance of a microbore 1.0-mm i.d. setup compared to the 2.1-mm i.d. benchmark for untargeted metabolomics. The 1.0-mm i.d. setup was implemented on a micro-UHPLC system, while the 2.1-mm i.d. on a standard UHPLC, both coupled to quadrupole-orbitrap HRMS. On polar standard metabolites, a sensitivity gain with an average 3.8-fold increase over the 2.1-mm i.d., along with lower LOD (LODavg 1.48 ng/mL vs. 6.18 ng/mL) and LOQ (LOQavg 4.94 ng/mL vs. 20.60 ng/mL), was observed. The microbore method detected and quantified all metabolites at LLOQ with respect to 2.1, also demonstrating good repeatability with lower CV% for retention times (0.29% vs. 0.63%) and peak areas (4.65% vs. 7.27%). The analysis of various samples, in both RP and HILIC modes, including different plasma volumes, dried blood spots (DBS), and colorectal cancer (CRC) patient-derived organoids (PDOs), in full scan-data dependent mode (FS-DDA) reported a significant increase in MS1 and MS2 features, as well as MS/MS spectral matches by 38.95%, 39.26%, and 18.23%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that 1.0-mm i.d. columns in UHPLC-HRMS could be a potential strategy to enhance coverage for low-amount samples while maintaining the same analytical throughput and robustness of 2.1-mm i.d. formats, with reduced solvent consumption
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/544032
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact