We investigate the effects of hedge accounting usage on firms’ level of capital investment. Analyzing a set of 286 public firms in the European Union during the period 2016–2019, our findings are threefold. Firstly, we provide evidence that firms which apply hedge accounting under IFRS requirements increase their level of capi- tal investment more than firms that do not exploit these accounting principles. Sec- ond, we also suggest that this link is mediated by the earnings volatility mitigation. Lastly, we find that such a relationship is exacerbated after the IFRS 9 implementa- tion period, consistently with the view that the newest hedge accounting rules pro- vided by the IASB are recognized to be more effective and more beneficial for firms, comparatively to IAS 39. These results are robust to different measures of capital investment, alternative models’ specifications, and after correcting for potential endogeneity concerns. We contribute with the first empirical study that explores the role of hedge accounting on investment behavior under different IFRS requirements. This research is valuable for standard setters and regulators to understand how their accounting requirements may affect firms’ economic decisions. From a managerial point of view, our study offers particular insights into hedge accounting mechanisms and practical implications about the role of accounting choices in real investments’ decision-making.

Hedge accounting usage and capital investment: European evidence under IFRS requirements

Rosalinda Santonastaso;
2024

Abstract

We investigate the effects of hedge accounting usage on firms’ level of capital investment. Analyzing a set of 286 public firms in the European Union during the period 2016–2019, our findings are threefold. Firstly, we provide evidence that firms which apply hedge accounting under IFRS requirements increase their level of capi- tal investment more than firms that do not exploit these accounting principles. Sec- ond, we also suggest that this link is mediated by the earnings volatility mitigation. Lastly, we find that such a relationship is exacerbated after the IFRS 9 implementa- tion period, consistently with the view that the newest hedge accounting rules pro- vided by the IASB are recognized to be more effective and more beneficial for firms, comparatively to IAS 39. These results are robust to different measures of capital investment, alternative models’ specifications, and after correcting for potential endogeneity concerns. We contribute with the first empirical study that explores the role of hedge accounting on investment behavior under different IFRS requirements. This research is valuable for standard setters and regulators to understand how their accounting requirements may affect firms’ economic decisions. From a managerial point of view, our study offers particular insights into hedge accounting mechanisms and practical implications about the role of accounting choices in real investments’ decision-making.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/540148
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact