Background: The prognostic weight of further decompensation in cirrhosis is still unclear. We investigated the incidence of further decompensation and its effect on mortality in patients with cirrhosis.Methods: Multicenter cohort study. The cumulative incidence of further decompensation (development of a second event or complication of a decompensating event) was assessed using competing risks analysis in 2028 patients. A four-state model was built: first decompensation, further decompensation, liver transplant, death. A cause-specific Cox model was used to assess the adjusted effect of further decompensation on mortality. Sensitivity analyses were performed for patients included before or after 1999. Results: In a mean follow-up of 43 months, 1192 patients developed further decompensation and 649 died. Corresponding 5-year cumulative incidences were 52% and 35%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of death and liver transplant after further decompensation were 55% and 9.7%, respectively. The most common further decompensating event was ascites/complications of ascites. Five-year probabilities of state occupation were: 24% alive with first decompensation, 21% alive with further decompensation, 7% alive with liver transplant, 16% dead after first decompensation without further decompensation, 31% dead after further decompensation, and <1% dead after liver transplant. The hazard ratio for death after further decompensation adjusted for known prognostic indicators, was 1.46 (95% CI 1.23-1-711) (p<0.001). The significant impact of further decompensation on survival was confirmed in patients included before or after 1999. Conclusion: In cirrhosis, further decompensation occurs in approximately 60% of patients, significantly increases mortality, and should be considered a more advanced stage of decompensated cirrhosis.

Further decompensation in cirrhosis: Results of a large multicenter cohort study supporting Baveno VII statements

Dallio, Marcello;Federico, Alessandro;
2024

Abstract

Background: The prognostic weight of further decompensation in cirrhosis is still unclear. We investigated the incidence of further decompensation and its effect on mortality in patients with cirrhosis.Methods: Multicenter cohort study. The cumulative incidence of further decompensation (development of a second event or complication of a decompensating event) was assessed using competing risks analysis in 2028 patients. A four-state model was built: first decompensation, further decompensation, liver transplant, death. A cause-specific Cox model was used to assess the adjusted effect of further decompensation on mortality. Sensitivity analyses were performed for patients included before or after 1999. Results: In a mean follow-up of 43 months, 1192 patients developed further decompensation and 649 died. Corresponding 5-year cumulative incidences were 52% and 35%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of death and liver transplant after further decompensation were 55% and 9.7%, respectively. The most common further decompensating event was ascites/complications of ascites. Five-year probabilities of state occupation were: 24% alive with first decompensation, 21% alive with further decompensation, 7% alive with liver transplant, 16% dead after first decompensation without further decompensation, 31% dead after further decompensation, and <1% dead after liver transplant. The hazard ratio for death after further decompensation adjusted for known prognostic indicators, was 1.46 (95% CI 1.23-1-711) (p<0.001). The significant impact of further decompensation on survival was confirmed in patients included before or after 1999. Conclusion: In cirrhosis, further decompensation occurs in approximately 60% of patients, significantly increases mortality, and should be considered a more advanced stage of decompensated cirrhosis.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/524008
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact