In recent years, precisely between the global financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic, the theme of the “return of the State” has resurfaced often and in different forms. Some authors, for instance, speak of the return of “neo-statism” on the ruins of neo-liberal ideology (Gerbaudo 2022), some others of “post-neoliberalism” (Cooper 2021; Davies and Gane 2021), while international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund have recently recommended (i.e. in the pandemic period) a large-scale intervention of national authorities to deal with the effects of the pandemic. In this essay we critically discuss the issue of the return of the state by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of this literature. In particular, we focus on the need to – first – theoretically frame the State, and in particular the neoliberal State, and – second – foster an alternative view of policy-making that takes into account the relative autonomy of State powers in managing the social conflict while advancing class-based interests. In the conclusions, while reasserting the centrality of State analysis, we discuss some possible lines of research capable to grasp continuities and changes at State level.

Still the return of the State? Critical issues and possible new research avenues

Diego Giannone
;
Adriano Cozzolino
2022

Abstract

In recent years, precisely between the global financial crisis and the Covid-19 pandemic, the theme of the “return of the State” has resurfaced often and in different forms. Some authors, for instance, speak of the return of “neo-statism” on the ruins of neo-liberal ideology (Gerbaudo 2022), some others of “post-neoliberalism” (Cooper 2021; Davies and Gane 2021), while international institutions such as the International Monetary Fund have recently recommended (i.e. in the pandemic period) a large-scale intervention of national authorities to deal with the effects of the pandemic. In this essay we critically discuss the issue of the return of the state by assessing the strengths and weaknesses of this literature. In particular, we focus on the need to – first – theoretically frame the State, and in particular the neoliberal State, and – second – foster an alternative view of policy-making that takes into account the relative autonomy of State powers in managing the social conflict while advancing class-based interests. In the conclusions, while reasserting the centrality of State analysis, we discuss some possible lines of research capable to grasp continuities and changes at State level.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/486957
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact