The Comparative Use of Multiple Electronic Devices in the Teledermoscopic Diagnosis of Early Melanoma

Background: The use of mobile electronic devices as support to medical activity was largely implemented in the past decade. Introduction: Our first aim was to evaluate the frequency of use of different electronic devices, that is, personal computer (PC), notebook, tablet, smartphone, in a pool of dermatologists recruited to perform multiple online testing session on difficult melanocytic skin lesions (MSLs) cases. The second aim was to evaluate the feasibility of each device in terms of teledermatologic diagnostic performance; the use of four different diagnostic methods, that is, intuitive diagnosis and three dermoscopic algorithms, was also investigated. Materials and Methods: A total of 111 dermatologists with 4 different levels of experience in dermoscopy, performed 4 tests (intuitive diagnosis and iDScore, ABCD rule, 7-point-checklist-based diagnosis) on 979 MSLs blinded cases. Each testing session was performed with a preferred device. Results: The overall highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) (82%) was obtained by young generation dermoscopists 1-4 years experience) when using an integrated clinical dermoscopic algorithm (iDScore) on a notebook. The average dermatologist using the iDScore obtained AUROC 77.40% with large screen devices (PC and notebook) 77.6% with small screen (tablet, smartphone) and 78.2% by combining the two. Discussion: Young generation of dermoscopists alternately use different devices, whereas elderly generation still prefer to use the PC. The diagnostic performances obtained with small/large screen were not statistically different from those obtained with fixed/mobile devices. Conclusions: Mobile devices were feasible tools to achieve adequate diagnostic accuracy in difficult MSLs, on a teledermatology setting, independently from participant skill level/age.