Objective To assess both the acceptance and the discontinuation rates from dapoxetine, the first oral pharmacological agent indicated for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). Methods One hundred twenty consecutive potent patients (mean age 40.3 years; range 18-63 years) seeking medical treatment for lifelong PE were enrolled in a prospective phase II study. Moreover, they were assessed regarding detailed medical and sexual history, intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and complete physical examination. The patients received a dapoxetine prescription (30 mg on demand) and unresponded cases received increased dose (60 mg after 3 months). The patients were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and requested to complete a multiple-choice global assessment questionnaire regarding specific reasons for eventual therapy discontinuation. Results Twenty-four of the patients (20%) decided not to start dapoxetine. Fear of using a "drug" was the most frequently reported reason for treatment nonacceptance (50%) and the cost of treatment was the reason for 25% of the patients. Ninety-six patients (80%) started the therapy. Twenty-six percent dropped out after 1 month, 42.7% dropped out after 3 months, 18.7% dropped out at 6 months, 2% dropped out at 12 months, and 10.4% are continuing the therapy after 1 year. The main reasons were effect below expectations 24.4%, costs 22.1%, side effects 19.8%, loss of interest in sex 19.8%, and no efficacy 13.9%. Conclusion Twenty percent of lifelong PE patients seeking medical treatment for early ejaculation freely decided not to start treatment with dapoxetine, and roughly 90% of the patients who started therapy discontinued after 1 year. �� 2013 Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Dapoxetine treatment in patients with lifelong premature ejaculation: The reasons of a "waterloo"

F. Fusco;
2013

Abstract

Objective To assess both the acceptance and the discontinuation rates from dapoxetine, the first oral pharmacological agent indicated for the treatment of premature ejaculation (PE). Methods One hundred twenty consecutive potent patients (mean age 40.3 years; range 18-63 years) seeking medical treatment for lifelong PE were enrolled in a prospective phase II study. Moreover, they were assessed regarding detailed medical and sexual history, intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and complete physical examination. The patients received a dapoxetine prescription (30 mg on demand) and unresponded cases received increased dose (60 mg after 3 months). The patients were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and requested to complete a multiple-choice global assessment questionnaire regarding specific reasons for eventual therapy discontinuation. Results Twenty-four of the patients (20%) decided not to start dapoxetine. Fear of using a "drug" was the most frequently reported reason for treatment nonacceptance (50%) and the cost of treatment was the reason for 25% of the patients. Ninety-six patients (80%) started the therapy. Twenty-six percent dropped out after 1 month, 42.7% dropped out after 3 months, 18.7% dropped out at 6 months, 2% dropped out at 12 months, and 10.4% are continuing the therapy after 1 year. The main reasons were effect below expectations 24.4%, costs 22.1%, side effects 19.8%, loss of interest in sex 19.8%, and no efficacy 13.9%. Conclusion Twenty percent of lifelong PE patients seeking medical treatment for early ejaculation freely decided not to start treatment with dapoxetine, and roughly 90% of the patients who started therapy discontinued after 1 year. �� 2013 Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/434849
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 58
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 54
social impact