Background: Endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery (ECTR) is a procedure that gained wide popularity resulting in reduced scar length and faster recovery. Different studies focused on how the type of skin closure affected the quality and the appearance of the final scar in carpal surgery release. In this study, we investigated the efficiency of a well-established primary skin closure method using Steri-Strips that, to date, has never been described in ECTR. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 47 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release at our clinic. All patients underwent the same surgical procedure performed by two different surgeons that differed only in the final skin closure: one used only Steri-Strips (group A), while the other used continuous absorbable subcuticular 4/0 monofilament polyglytone 6211 sutures (group B). Data collected included photographs at 10 days and three months after surgery and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain evaluation, while the measure for the scar evaluation was the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. We also performed the Wilcoxon rank test to assess if there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pain and scar quality. Results: A total of 47 patients were included in this study. According to skin closure technique performed, the patients were categorised into two groups, A and B. Group A comprised 26 patients in which only Steri-Strips were used for the final skin closure; group B included 21 patients in which the closure was performed through 4/0 polyglytone. Data obtained from the VAS and from the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Data obtained from the evaluation of the visual analogue scale showed no significant differences in the median scores and similar postoperative pain between the two groups for all the 7 days of data recorded (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Skin closure with Steri-Strips is a safe, secure and cheap method that leads to excellent aesthetic results. It is both a first choice and a valid alternative to intradermal suture for wound closure after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Steri-Strips™ vs. intracuticular skin suture in endoscopic release of carpal tunnel: a retrospective study and review of the literature

Pieretti G.;Nicoletti G. F.;
2020

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic carpal tunnel surgery (ECTR) is a procedure that gained wide popularity resulting in reduced scar length and faster recovery. Different studies focused on how the type of skin closure affected the quality and the appearance of the final scar in carpal surgery release. In this study, we investigated the efficiency of a well-established primary skin closure method using Steri-Strips that, to date, has never been described in ECTR. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 47 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release at our clinic. All patients underwent the same surgical procedure performed by two different surgeons that differed only in the final skin closure: one used only Steri-Strips (group A), while the other used continuous absorbable subcuticular 4/0 monofilament polyglytone 6211 sutures (group B). Data collected included photographs at 10 days and three months after surgery and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain evaluation, while the measure for the scar evaluation was the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale. We also performed the Wilcoxon rank test to assess if there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of pain and scar quality. Results: A total of 47 patients were included in this study. According to skin closure technique performed, the patients were categorised into two groups, A and B. Group A comprised 26 patients in which only Steri-Strips were used for the final skin closure; group B included 21 patients in which the closure was performed through 4/0 polyglytone. Data obtained from the VAS and from the Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale showed no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Data obtained from the evaluation of the visual analogue scale showed no significant differences in the median scores and similar postoperative pain between the two groups for all the 7 days of data recorded (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Skin closure with Steri-Strips is a safe, secure and cheap method that leads to excellent aesthetic results. It is both a first choice and a valid alternative to intradermal suture for wound closure after endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/431169
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact