Introduction. Psoriasis produces functional and aesthetic damages which cause psychosocial discomfort and require new adjustment factors. Aims. We describe the correlation among discomfort and personality factors as traits, coping, defense mechanism (DM) and resilience in Ps (skin psoriasis) and PsA (psoriatic arthritis) patients. Materials and Methods. A random sample, age between 45-60, with 1:1 female/male, includes 3 groups each of 90 subjects: - single psoriasis (Ps, average 50.11, SD 4.9928) - Ps and psoriatic arthritis (PsA, average 50.61, SD 4.8765) - controls (C, average 50.0 and SD 4.8019). We evaluated traits by the 16PF-5, coping by Cope Scale, defence mechanism (DM) by DMRS, dysmorphophobia by BDDE and resilience by CR-RISC scales. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 14 version, p < 0.05 and t, F, W and P tests and clinical analysis. Results. We recorded a reduction in traits and coping and an increase in DM, dysmorphophobia and resilience. PsA patients showed a greater distress and adjustment factors than Ps alone. Tests showed a valid significance (p < 0.00001), an effect size from 0.30 to > 0.50 in comparison patients-C and η2 = 1.4 in comparison Ps-PsA. In all patients- controls OR, PAR and NNT registered very high values. Discussion. Reduction in autonomy and imperfections cause an internal damage. The adaptation process searches coping factors (to integrate traits) when lesions appear. It selects DM when stressful dynamics require a further adaptation. Finally it results in adequate resilience when damages and dysmorphophobia are offset by traits, coping and DM. Conclusions. Clinical signs increase more then traits in severity, coping decrease in resources, resilience and DM grow in use and dismorphophobia just increases in intensity.

Discomfort and adaptation in psoriatic patients: An inchoate supportive care trial

Iurassich S.
2016

Abstract

Introduction. Psoriasis produces functional and aesthetic damages which cause psychosocial discomfort and require new adjustment factors. Aims. We describe the correlation among discomfort and personality factors as traits, coping, defense mechanism (DM) and resilience in Ps (skin psoriasis) and PsA (psoriatic arthritis) patients. Materials and Methods. A random sample, age between 45-60, with 1:1 female/male, includes 3 groups each of 90 subjects: - single psoriasis (Ps, average 50.11, SD 4.9928) - Ps and psoriatic arthritis (PsA, average 50.61, SD 4.8765) - controls (C, average 50.0 and SD 4.8019). We evaluated traits by the 16PF-5, coping by Cope Scale, defence mechanism (DM) by DMRS, dysmorphophobia by BDDE and resilience by CR-RISC scales. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 14 version, p < 0.05 and t, F, W and P tests and clinical analysis. Results. We recorded a reduction in traits and coping and an increase in DM, dysmorphophobia and resilience. PsA patients showed a greater distress and adjustment factors than Ps alone. Tests showed a valid significance (p < 0.00001), an effect size from 0.30 to > 0.50 in comparison patients-C and η2 = 1.4 in comparison Ps-PsA. In all patients- controls OR, PAR and NNT registered very high values. Discussion. Reduction in autonomy and imperfections cause an internal damage. The adaptation process searches coping factors (to integrate traits) when lesions appear. It selects DM when stressful dynamics require a further adaptation. Finally it results in adequate resilience when damages and dysmorphophobia are offset by traits, coping and DM. Conclusions. Clinical signs increase more then traits in severity, coping decrease in resources, resilience and DM grow in use and dismorphophobia just increases in intensity.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/428542
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact