In this paper, I address the important and challenging remarks offered by Elvio Baccarini and Francesca Pasquali to my proposal for solving the justificatory dilemma of political liberalism. In replying to their observations, I clarify and defend two crucial aspects of my model of political legitimacy: i. the different justificatory roles played by the ideal phase and the non-ideal phase of the theory; ii. the epistemic dimension of political agency that I lay out relating to the concept of epistemic peerhood.

Legittimità democratica, giustificazioni pubbliche e parità epistemica. Una replica a Baccarini e Pasquali

Federica Liveriero
2019

Abstract

In this paper, I address the important and challenging remarks offered by Elvio Baccarini and Francesca Pasquali to my proposal for solving the justificatory dilemma of political liberalism. In replying to their observations, I clarify and defend two crucial aspects of my model of political legitimacy: i. the different justificatory roles played by the ideal phase and the non-ideal phase of the theory; ii. the epistemic dimension of political agency that I lay out relating to the concept of epistemic peerhood.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/421223
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact