The paper discusses the recent diffusion of environmental courts and tribunal all over the world. After a comparative introduction it describes the leading experience at a world level: the National Green Tribunal of India. This judicial body (normally addressed as NGT) was established in 2010 to fulfil a specific request of the Supreme Court to set up a judicial body for “the effective and expeditious disposal of cases relating to environmental protection and conservation of forest and other natural resources.” One of the main NGT’s features is its constitution: it comprises both ordinary judges and expert members coming from the scientific and technical disciplines, with a 50% ratio. It represents, thus, a “mixed jurisdiction” where members not having a legal background can adjudicate a case with their decisive vote. The paper analyzes some of such cases illustrating how the NGT is not only deciding on big infrastructural or industrial projects having adverse effects on the environment, but also on very relevant questions regarding the relations between science and environment, or environment and religious/ local customs.

Giustizia ambientale e green judges nel diritto comparato: il caso del National Green Tribunal of India

Amirante Domenico
2018

Abstract

The paper discusses the recent diffusion of environmental courts and tribunal all over the world. After a comparative introduction it describes the leading experience at a world level: the National Green Tribunal of India. This judicial body (normally addressed as NGT) was established in 2010 to fulfil a specific request of the Supreme Court to set up a judicial body for “the effective and expeditious disposal of cases relating to environmental protection and conservation of forest and other natural resources.” One of the main NGT’s features is its constitution: it comprises both ordinary judges and expert members coming from the scientific and technical disciplines, with a 50% ratio. It represents, thus, a “mixed jurisdiction” where members not having a legal background can adjudicate a case with their decisive vote. The paper analyzes some of such cases illustrating how the NGT is not only deciding on big infrastructural or industrial projects having adverse effects on the environment, but also on very relevant questions regarding the relations between science and environment, or environment and religious/ local customs.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11591/401933
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact