Research on intertemporal decision-making has often used Strathman, Gleicher, Boninger, and Edwards's (1994) 12-item consideration of future consequences scale, or the CFC-14 scale (Joireman, Shaffer, Balliet, & Strathman, 2012). The present studies examined the measurement properties of an Italian CFC-14 scale, and the utility of distinguishing between its two subscales (consideration of future and consideration of immediate consequences). In Study 1 (N = 832 adolescents, 964 adults), exploratory factor analyses suggested two factors and confirmatory factor analyses indicated the two-correlated factors and bi-factor models fit the data well. Study 2 (N = 152 undergraduates) assessed the relationship between the two scales with Zimbardo and Boyd's time perspective inventory and revealed a high 8-week test-retest reliability (> 0.74). Study 3 (N = 432 adolescents) revealed CFC-Immediate scores did not differ as a function of age, whereas CFC-Future scores were higher among adolescents 16 and older. Study 4 (N = 235 adolescents, 235 adults) revealed that adolescents and adults did not differ on CFC-Immediate, but adults scored significantly higher than adolescents on CFC-Future. Results support the validity of the Italian CFC-14, and provide insight into the developmental trajectory of time orientation, wherein adolescents and adults differ in concern with future (but not immediate) orientation.

An Italian translation and validation of the Consideration of Future Consequences-14 Scale

NIGRO, Giovanna
;
COSENZA, Marina
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Ciccarelli, Maria
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2016

Abstract

Research on intertemporal decision-making has often used Strathman, Gleicher, Boninger, and Edwards's (1994) 12-item consideration of future consequences scale, or the CFC-14 scale (Joireman, Shaffer, Balliet, & Strathman, 2012). The present studies examined the measurement properties of an Italian CFC-14 scale, and the utility of distinguishing between its two subscales (consideration of future and consideration of immediate consequences). In Study 1 (N = 832 adolescents, 964 adults), exploratory factor analyses suggested two factors and confirmatory factor analyses indicated the two-correlated factors and bi-factor models fit the data well. Study 2 (N = 152 undergraduates) assessed the relationship between the two scales with Zimbardo and Boyd's time perspective inventory and revealed a high 8-week test-retest reliability (> 0.74). Study 3 (N = 432 adolescents) revealed CFC-Immediate scores did not differ as a function of age, whereas CFC-Future scores were higher among adolescents 16 and older. Study 4 (N = 235 adolescents, 235 adults) revealed that adolescents and adults did not differ on CFC-Immediate, but adults scored significantly higher than adolescents on CFC-Future. Results support the validity of the Italian CFC-14, and provide insight into the developmental trajectory of time orientation, wherein adolescents and adults differ in concern with future (but not immediate) orientation.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/357323
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact