The author analyzes Emil Lask’s Fichtes Idealismus und die Geschichte (1902), remarking its failure in the attempt of founding an integrative relationship between value and real individuality, and of reconciling the transcendence of validity with the individual foundation of value. The possibility of conceiving an integrative dimension between value and reality supposes the rejection of any valuable universalism and the acknowledgement of all the relativizing consequences deriving from the fact that value emerges only within the historical individuality. Anyway, the author believes that an universality of value, understood as valuableness, that is the common capacity to attribute value which is typical of the historical subjects, is still conceivable.
Universalità come valoriabilità. Considerazioni sul “Fallimento” del Fichtebuch di Emil Lask
Giovanni Morrone
2013
Abstract
The author analyzes Emil Lask’s Fichtes Idealismus und die Geschichte (1902), remarking its failure in the attempt of founding an integrative relationship between value and real individuality, and of reconciling the transcendence of validity with the individual foundation of value. The possibility of conceiving an integrative dimension between value and reality supposes the rejection of any valuable universalism and the acknowledgement of all the relativizing consequences deriving from the fact that value emerges only within the historical individuality. Anyway, the author believes that an universality of value, understood as valuableness, that is the common capacity to attribute value which is typical of the historical subjects, is still conceivable.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
