Background. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of pericardial effusion in acute myocardial infarction and the different prognosis associated with distinct patterns of pericardial effusion (anechoic/hypoechoic vs hyperechoic effusion). Methods. Five hundred eighty-five consecutive patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit for acute myocardial infarction were initially considered. Forty of them were excluded due to a technically poor acoustic window. The remaining 545 patients were studied by two-dimensional echocardiography at admission, before discharge (after an average of 9 days in the Coronary Care Unit) and whenever there was an important change in the clinical status (chest pain, lipothymia or syncope, hemodynamic deterioration with systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, cardiac arrest). Results. Pericardial effusion was found in 51 patients (9%). Three distinct textural patterns of pericardial effusion were noted on the basis of the echogenic properties: 1) anechoic or hypoechoic pericardial effusion was frequent (30 patients), mild or moderate and generally benign; 2) hyperechoic type 'A' effusion pattern was rare (2 patients) and associated with fever, leukocytosis and pericardial rubs; 3) hyperechoic type 'B' was frequent (19 patients), large and always associated with major complications (all cases cardiac tamponade and/or death). Conclusions. Pericardial effusion is not an uncommon finding in serial echo evaluation of patients with acute myocardial infarction, especially when infarction is anterior, extensive and Q wave. Echocardiographically detected pericardial effusion shows different textural patterns with hypoanechoic effusion more frequent, limited and prognostically benign than hyperechoic effusion larger and often associated with adverse events.

The spectrum of pericardial effusion in acute myocardial infarction: An echocardiographic study

LIMONGELLI, Giuseppe;CALABRO', Raffaele;
2000

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of pericardial effusion in acute myocardial infarction and the different prognosis associated with distinct patterns of pericardial effusion (anechoic/hypoechoic vs hyperechoic effusion). Methods. Five hundred eighty-five consecutive patients admitted to the Coronary Care Unit for acute myocardial infarction were initially considered. Forty of them were excluded due to a technically poor acoustic window. The remaining 545 patients were studied by two-dimensional echocardiography at admission, before discharge (after an average of 9 days in the Coronary Care Unit) and whenever there was an important change in the clinical status (chest pain, lipothymia or syncope, hemodynamic deterioration with systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, cardiac arrest). Results. Pericardial effusion was found in 51 patients (9%). Three distinct textural patterns of pericardial effusion were noted on the basis of the echogenic properties: 1) anechoic or hypoechoic pericardial effusion was frequent (30 patients), mild or moderate and generally benign; 2) hyperechoic type 'A' effusion pattern was rare (2 patients) and associated with fever, leukocytosis and pericardial rubs; 3) hyperechoic type 'B' was frequent (19 patients), large and always associated with major complications (all cases cardiac tamponade and/or death). Conclusions. Pericardial effusion is not an uncommon finding in serial echo evaluation of patients with acute myocardial infarction, especially when infarction is anterior, extensive and Q wave. Echocardiographically detected pericardial effusion shows different textural patterns with hypoanechoic effusion more frequent, limited and prognostically benign than hyperechoic effusion larger and often associated with adverse events.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/224452
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact