The goal of this article is to revise several aspects of the well-known classification of landslides, developed by D.J. Varnes (1978). The primary recommendation is to modify the definition of landslide-forming materials, in order to provide compatibility with accepted geotechnical and geological terminology of rocks and soils. Other, less important modifications of the classification system are suggested, resulting from recent developments of the landslide science. The modified Varnes Classification of landslides has 32 landslide types, each of which is backed by a formal definition. The definitions should facilitate backward compatibility of the system as well as possible translation to other languages. Complex landslides are not included as a separate type category, but composite types can be constructed by the user of the classification by combining two or more type names, if advan-tageous.
Varnes classification of landslide types, an update
PICARELLI, Luciano
2014
Abstract
The goal of this article is to revise several aspects of the well-known classification of landslides, developed by D.J. Varnes (1978). The primary recommendation is to modify the definition of landslide-forming materials, in order to provide compatibility with accepted geotechnical and geological terminology of rocks and soils. Other, less important modifications of the classification system are suggested, resulting from recent developments of the landslide science. The modified Varnes Classification of landslides has 32 landslide types, each of which is backed by a formal definition. The definitions should facilitate backward compatibility of the system as well as possible translation to other languages. Complex landslides are not included as a separate type category, but composite types can be constructed by the user of the classification by combining two or more type names, if advan-tageous.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.