Curved structures (i.e. arches and vaults) are recognized as distinctive elements of the masonry built heritage, and in particular of churches. If on the one hand they represent structural and architectural elements of signifi-cant values, on the other they can experience important damage in case of seismic actions, being characterized by significant vulnerability. The structural assessment of masonry curved structures can be based on several simplified geometrical representations and performed at different detail levels, including limit analysis (with a kinematic or static approach) and finite or discrete element modelling. Therefore, the present paper focuses on the seismic response of curved structures in historical masonry, investigated by means of different approaches. In particular, a comparative assessment of these approaches is carried out considering multiple configurations including i. stand-alone arches; ii. arches supported by lateral piers; iii. triumphal arches (diaphragm arches). Strengths and limits of each method are compared, highlighting possible differences in the collapse predic-tions. Also, by means of parametric analyses, the main sources of vulnerability and failure modes of curved structures are investigated and critically assessed.

Seismic response of curved structures in historical masonry churches

Corrado Chisari;Mattia Zizi;Jafar Rouhi;Gianfranco De Matteis
2022

Abstract

Curved structures (i.e. arches and vaults) are recognized as distinctive elements of the masonry built heritage, and in particular of churches. If on the one hand they represent structural and architectural elements of signifi-cant values, on the other they can experience important damage in case of seismic actions, being characterized by significant vulnerability. The structural assessment of masonry curved structures can be based on several simplified geometrical representations and performed at different detail levels, including limit analysis (with a kinematic or static approach) and finite or discrete element modelling. Therefore, the present paper focuses on the seismic response of curved structures in historical masonry, investigated by means of different approaches. In particular, a comparative assessment of these approaches is carried out considering multiple configurations including i. stand-alone arches; ii. arches supported by lateral piers; iii. triumphal arches (diaphragm arches). Strengths and limits of each method are compared, highlighting possible differences in the collapse predic-tions. Also, by means of parametric analyses, the main sources of vulnerability and failure modes of curved structures are investigated and critically assessed.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11591/478538
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact