Wall-Modelled Large-Eddy Simulations (WMLES) and hybrid RANS/LES simulations of wall-bounded flows with non-homogeneous roughness were carried out. The flow under consideration is an open channel, with alternating rough- and smooth-wall strips oriented transverse to the flow. Results were compared to turbulent boundary-layer experiments in a similar configuration. Despite the fact that all models considered rely on an equilibrium assumption (production=dissipation), and are designed to yield the logarithmic law-of-the-wall at the inner/outer-layer interface, they predict the readjustment of the flow to the new surface conditions fairly accurately. They compare well to the experiments, both in terms of mean velocity and wall-shear stress. The hybrid method predicts the sharp variation of the skin friction coefficient after the roughness transition more accurately, at the expense of a higher computational cost. The implications and limitations of the equilibrium assumption will be discussed. Research supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC).
Wall-Modelled Large-Eddy Simulations of flows with non-uniform roughness
TERESA SALOMONE
;GIULIANO DE STEFANO
2022
Abstract
Wall-Modelled Large-Eddy Simulations (WMLES) and hybrid RANS/LES simulations of wall-bounded flows with non-homogeneous roughness were carried out. The flow under consideration is an open channel, with alternating rough- and smooth-wall strips oriented transverse to the flow. Results were compared to turbulent boundary-layer experiments in a similar configuration. Despite the fact that all models considered rely on an equilibrium assumption (production=dissipation), and are designed to yield the logarithmic law-of-the-wall at the inner/outer-layer interface, they predict the readjustment of the flow to the new surface conditions fairly accurately. They compare well to the experiments, both in terms of mean velocity and wall-shear stress. The hybrid method predicts the sharp variation of the skin friction coefficient after the roughness transition more accurately, at the expense of a higher computational cost. The implications and limitations of the equilibrium assumption will be discussed. Research supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC).I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.