Emerging production technologies, in particular Additive Manufacturing (AM), nowadays are extremely suitable for creating highly complex products, tending towards the concept of ‘complexity for free’, which is often associated with AM. However, there are no adequate guidelines to provide decision support for the correct selection of the most economically appropriate technology. Indeed, from literature it has been highlighted the need to develop a technology selection methodology based no longer on production volume but on product complexity. This paper investigates this need by presenting an approach to determine the geometrical (or shape) complexity index of a part, which, combined with the assembly complexity, represents the driver for helping to decide the best production technology (traditional or additive). The geometrical complexity index has been determined based on complexity judgments, provided by CAD modelling experts, for a sample of CAD models. In this way, it has been possible to define a preliminary complexity index model, strictly linked to the CAD model information. The results showed that the geometrical complexity metrics from the literature, if individually considered, are not comprehensive. However, a combination of them makes it possible to obtain an index that best reflects the subjective judgement of the experts. In addition, by combining the geometrical and assembly complexity with a cost analysis it is possible to obtain convenience zones for better selecting the production technology. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
On the Geometrical Complexity Index as a Driver for Selecting the Production Technology
Greco A.
;Manco P.;Gerbino S.Supervision
2022
Abstract
Emerging production technologies, in particular Additive Manufacturing (AM), nowadays are extremely suitable for creating highly complex products, tending towards the concept of ‘complexity for free’, which is often associated with AM. However, there are no adequate guidelines to provide decision support for the correct selection of the most economically appropriate technology. Indeed, from literature it has been highlighted the need to develop a technology selection methodology based no longer on production volume but on product complexity. This paper investigates this need by presenting an approach to determine the geometrical (or shape) complexity index of a part, which, combined with the assembly complexity, represents the driver for helping to decide the best production technology (traditional or additive). The geometrical complexity index has been determined based on complexity judgments, provided by CAD modelling experts, for a sample of CAD models. In this way, it has been possible to define a preliminary complexity index model, strictly linked to the CAD model information. The results showed that the geometrical complexity metrics from the literature, if individually considered, are not comprehensive. However, a combination of them makes it possible to obtain an index that best reflects the subjective judgement of the experts. In addition, by combining the geometrical and assembly complexity with a cost analysis it is possible to obtain convenience zones for better selecting the production technology. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.