The first part of this paper is dedicated to the analysis of the administrative jurisdiction, and the author finds out several reasons which – especially in regard to socially delicate interests – would justify the enhancement of additional remedies of protection for citizens, managed by the same public administration apparatus. On account of this, the author draws attention to the circumstance that a fundamental characteristic of this public administration judicial function is that the administrative bodies in charge of the decision have a level of impartiality such that the general interest in the justice is fulfilled. In conclusion, the aim of this paper is to determine the essential requirements of the public administration judicial function – such as informality, promptness, economy – as well as its own limits and procedure features.
Tre quesiti sulla giustizia nell'amministrazione
SPASIANO, Mario Rosario
2015
Abstract
The first part of this paper is dedicated to the analysis of the administrative jurisdiction, and the author finds out several reasons which – especially in regard to socially delicate interests – would justify the enhancement of additional remedies of protection for citizens, managed by the same public administration apparatus. On account of this, the author draws attention to the circumstance that a fundamental characteristic of this public administration judicial function is that the administrative bodies in charge of the decision have a level of impartiality such that the general interest in the justice is fulfilled. In conclusion, the aim of this paper is to determine the essential requirements of the public administration judicial function – such as informality, promptness, economy – as well as its own limits and procedure features.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.