The criteria for deficit schizophrenia were designed to define a group of patients with enduring, primary (or idiopathic) negative symptoms. In 2001, a review of the literature suggested that deficit schizophrenia constitutes a disease separate from nondeficit forms of schizophrenia. Here we provide a review of new studies, not included in that paper, in which patients with deficit schizophrenia and those with nondeficit schizophrenia were compared on dimensions typically used to distinguish diseases: signs and symptoms, course of illness, pathophysiological correlates, risk and etiological factors, and treatment response. Replicated findings and new evidence of double dissociation supporting the separate disease hypothesis are highlighted. Weaknesses in research and treatment options for these patients are also emphasized.
Deficit schizophrenia: an update
GALDERISI, Silvana
2008
Abstract
The criteria for deficit schizophrenia were designed to define a group of patients with enduring, primary (or idiopathic) negative symptoms. In 2001, a review of the literature suggested that deficit schizophrenia constitutes a disease separate from nondeficit forms of schizophrenia. Here we provide a review of new studies, not included in that paper, in which patients with deficit schizophrenia and those with nondeficit schizophrenia were compared on dimensions typically used to distinguish diseases: signs and symptoms, course of illness, pathophysiological correlates, risk and etiological factors, and treatment response. Replicated findings and new evidence of double dissociation supporting the separate disease hypothesis are highlighted. Weaknesses in research and treatment options for these patients are also emphasized.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
